UK-hosted, ISO-accredited data centres. Fully GDPR-compliant.
Speak to the teamGuidance for expert witnesses and injury law firms on medical evidence, reporting and compliance.
The joint statement is where two experts agree what they agree on and pin down exactly where they part. Walk into the discussion with the records in order and your reasoning already on the page, and the meeting sharpens the case. Walk in unprepared and it is where a sound opinion quietly comes apart.
AI medical record review uses language models to read a medico-legal bundle, GP records, hospital notes, imaging and correspondence, and return an indexed chronology, typed fact tables and summaries with a source page attached to every fact. Used well, it turns days of reading into hours. Used badly, it produces confident answers no one can check. The line between the two is the source page.
Under Part 35 of the Civil Procedure Rules, an expert's overriding duty is to the court, not to the party paying them. That duty shapes the independence of the opinion, the mandatory statements in the report, and the obligation to flag where the evidence is incomplete or your view has a range.
ALLDOQ is a sponsor of Ireland's Expert Witness Conference 2026, held on 20 May at the Radisson Blu Royal in Dublin. The day brings judges, barristers, solicitors and expert witnesses together to examine the standards behind credible expert evidence, from methodology and independence to AI and cross-examination.
A medical chronology turns thousands of pages of records into a single ordered account of what happened and when. Build it well, with every entry tied to its source page, and it becomes the backbone of a defensible report. Build it badly and it is the first thing the other side takes apart.
Exporting frames from a separate workstation into Word loses fidelity and breaks the audit trail. A browser viewer built for medico-legal work can do better.
A medical chronology is a dated, sourced timeline of every clinical event in a case. Built well, it turns thousands of disordered pages into one reliable spine the whole claim runs along. The test is simple: every entry carries the document and page it came from, so anyone can check it.
The brief asks for an opinion. The relationship is built on the things the brief does not spell out. Here is what keeps a firm coming back.
Where clinical records physically live carries real legal weight. A practical guide to data residency for medico-legal work.
Court-ready reports have to be thorough, consistent and fast at the same time. Here is how structured drafting changes the economics of expert reporting.
Breach is only half the case. The other half is causation: showing that the breach, rather than the underlying condition, made the difference. An expert who keeps the two apart and shows the working writes an opinion that holds. One who blurs them hands the other side an opening.
